If you wanted to learn desktop publishing ...

One cool technology with lots of educational possibilities is Adobe InDesign. This program allows you to make sweet posters, pamphlets, books, cards, ANYTHING! It's very powerful. I'd consider teaching it to you but I think we have only one copy in the McKay lab :-(.

So instead, if you want to learn it, you'll have to teach yourself. Here's a great way to do this! Go to this link:

http://weblog.edupodder.com/2004/11/i-podcast-class.html

And download the powerpoint and the audiofile. You can listen to the audio while you flip through the powerpoint (another cool way to use podcasting technology, by the way).

Wait! I can hear the pessimism already! "But Rick, InDesign is expensive and we won't have it in our school." Well, you're right, you probably won't have it in your school, except maybe just one or two copies. But you will probably have similar programs, like Microsoft Publisher, which does pretty much the same thing but not as well as InDesign. That's the trick with technologies, they really make up a bunch of "classes." You have the "desktop publishing class" and the "photo manipulation class" (like Photoshop), the "drawing tool" class (like Illustrator), the "spreadsheet class" (like Excel) and the "presentation class" like PowerPoint, and lots of others. Once you learn one tool, you can pretty much use any of the tools in its class because they work the same way. So, no, you might not have InDesign, Photoshop, or Illustrator at your school, but learning these tools will definitely help you take advantage of the programs that you WILL have.

Great ethics posts

Here are some great thoughts from your classmates on our ethics mini lessons:

J'Nette

"There are alot of programs available for teachers to help detect students that find these easy ways to cheat hardwork.
I liked the idea of having broader questioned assignments. Rather than marking a bubble sheet they could explain the knowledge they have learned. They have a chance to defend their reasoning and it gives the teacher a better perspective of where they could improve on their teaching."

Bonnie

"It really hit me after the various lessons on ethics how important information is in our society today. there are so many devices and technologies made specifically to find, transmit and store information. It is the whole basis of our society. So it makes sense that there are so many different laws protecting information. I'm sure none of us ever consider going into a store and taking something without buying it, but many of us don't even bat an eye at stealing information, ideas, music, software, etc. It is so easy to get sometimes that it doesn't seem like stealing at all. Many of these types of things are a lot more valuable than things one might steal from a store."

I agree! Ideas may be the most valuable thing someone owns! We shouldn't break copyright just because we're worried about getting sued (who cares about that?), we should be ethical just because it's right.

Matt talks about a way to prevent cheating -- use creative and nontraditional forms of assessment!

"Another thing that can be done is to get rid of traditional tests and replace them with some other type of evaluation. group or individual projects can easily be made to show learning of a unit's concepts. for example, instead of taking a test on cells- what is mitochondria for? and what does the nucleus do?- a project could be to compare a cell and something familiar to the student (idea from marta adair). the student compares the cell and its contents to the postal service: the post office is the nucleus because it takes in all the new information (out-going letters) and processes what has to be done to get them to their correct destinations. the mitochondria is represented by money. in order for the cell (postal service) to work, it needs a sorce of energy (money). this allows the students to be creative and work together in generating concrete anchors to abstract concepts. this will help them remember what exactly the nucleus does instead of remembering that the answer was"

Interesting post from Jonathan about how much we should be involved in protecting students. There's a real ethical dilemma for you! How do we balance professionalism with our moral responsibility to help students become decent people? A quote from Jonathan:

"In my classes, this semester, I have been told that I should not try to play a role in my future students' personal lives and that I am not there to be a friend. I respect such opinions of my professors and naiive student teachers. Well, I don't see how one can't be a friend and a confidant to the students. They spnd most of their adolescence in classrooms with teachers. Whether people like it or not, teachers often have greater influences on kids than parents and are the people who they spend most of their time with until they graduate."

Here's a great question from Jared - I encourage you to go to his blog and discuss it!

"There is a film that really has facilitated some of my thinking. The movie is The Emporer's Club. In the film, Kevin Klein is a teacher at a private school. He finds out that his student that he liked a lot was cheating in an academic competition. For various reasons, he lets the cheating pass. Then, many years later, he comes to discover that this former student, now an important figure in society, still resorts to cheating for personal gain. How responsible was Kevin Klein's character? How responsible are we, as teachers, for the honesty of our students? Let me know what you think."

Why students should publish

Some of you may have wondered why the big deal in this class with the web (blogs, wikis, etc.). Part of it is that I feel it is very important for students to be public about their work. Written reports that go straight to the teacher and nobody else serves nobody. If we're going to put the work into learning something, shouldn't that knowledge be shared with as many people as possible?

But that's only part of it. I also feel that the more students must show their work publicly, the better that work will be. As David Wiley said recently at the AECT conference I attended, "open peer review always improves quality IF you actually care what other people think about you." There's some healthy debate at Dave's blog about whether this is true, so read it if you are interested. I, for one, agree with this statement and feel that it is usually (maybe not always) true. I know I have been much more careful and thoughtful about what I put on my blog since I learned several of my peers and others are reading it.

This is partly the purpose for blogs and wikis - free publishing! Students can publish their thoughts and feedback in a public arena. Will Richardson had a thought recently about this that every technology tool should have a publish feature. Wouldn't that be cool if a student could make an iMovie, and then publish it to the web? Or make an Excel spreadsheet, or Publisher document, or Photoshop file, or ANYTHING and then publish to the web and all of our aggregators would notify us that this student has something new for us to look at, and we can all look at it and learn, and then we could give feedback, and we'd all be better because of this exchange ...

Maybe I'm too optimistic, but I do think it'd be cool!

Some of you may have wondered why the big deal in this class with the web (blogs, wikis, etc.). Part of it is that I feel it is very important for students to be public about their work. Written reports that go straight to the teacher and nobody else serves nobody. If we're going to put the work into learning something, shouldn't that knowledge be shared with as many people as possible?

But that's only part of it. I also feel that the more students must show their work publicly, the better that work will be. As David Wiley said recently at the AECT conference I attended, "open peer review always improves quality IF you actually care what other people think about you." There's some healthy debate at Dave's blog about whether this is true, so read it if you are interested. I, for one, agree with this statement and feel that it is usually (maybe not always) true. I know I have been much more careful and thoughtful about what I put on my blog since I learned several of my peers and others are reading it.

This is partly the purpose for blogs and wikis - free publishing! Students can publish their thoughts and feedback in a public arena. Will Richardson had a thought recently about this that every technology tool should have a publish feature. Wouldn't that be cool if a student could make an iMovie, and then publish it to the web? Or make an Excel spreadsheet, or Publisher document, or Photoshop file, or ANYTHING and then publish to the web and all of our aggregators would notify us that this student has something new for us to look at, and we can all look at it and learn, and then we could give feedback, and we'd all be better because of this exchange ...

Maybe I'm too optimistic, but I do think it'd be cool!